A Yelled DOGE Barks: Liberals’ Responsive Attitude to a Reducing Expenses Agency

Being a strong supporter of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and its mission, I am pleased to see its progress in the first two weeks. The fact that the left has shifted from criticizing its lack of power to claiming it has too much power indicates that it is gaining momentum.
In Washington, when progressives argue that any conservative group possesses excessive authority, it signifies an intriguing turn of events. In the South, there is a saying that conveys a similar notion: “A kicked dog hollers.”
A prime example of this shift is Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), who is now expressing various complaints related to DOGE. One of the main objections is that DOGE lacks the legal power to perform any actions.
While Schumer’s point is technically accurate, in a more significant aspect, he is entirely misinformed. Initially functioning as a well-orchestrated public relations campaign, DOGE has emerged as a genuine entity within the federal government. It operates within the confines of the U.S. Digital Service, an agency established by President Barack Obama in 2014 to enhance government services with technology, notably fixing the healthcare.gov website.
Despite Schumer’s claim that DOGE lacks real authority, similar to the U.S. Digital Service having an indirect influence, DOGE commands the same power. The discrepancy now lies in agency responses; whereas some agencies welcomed the U.S. Digital Service’s support, numerous agencies are fiercely resisting DOGE’s influence and transparency.
DOGE is attempting unprecedented actions, exposing hidden challenges within government operations. It surpasses my previous experience with Consumer Financial Protection Bureau staff in identifying potential dual job holders, revealing the potential for transparency.
Another point of contention from the left involves Elon Musk and his team designated as “special government employees.” These titles, although portrayed ominously in the media, indicate part-time government employees subject to certain regulations, not the full scope of governmental rules.
As someone who faced similar criticism when classified as a special government employee, I recognize that discontent is often rooted in job nature. Despite the potential hurdles in achieving significant cost savings, DOGE’s legitimate status reflects its evolving impact. The pushback from the left is likely a response to DOGE’s actions more than its strategies.
In conclusion, a pushed dog will certainly make noise.
Mick Mulvaney, a former U.S. Congressman from South Carolina, is a NewsNation contributor who previously served in various roles under President Donald Trump, including Director of the Office of Management and Budget and White House Chief of Staff.